Argumentation in Secondary School Students' Structured and Unstructured Chat Discussions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argument Elaboration during Structured and Unstructured Dyadic Chat Discussion in Secondary School
This study aims to investigate whether structuring an interaction supports students’ elaborative argumentation. The study compares the quality of secondary school students’ (N = 16) argumentation during dyadic structured and unstructured computer-based chat interaction. The results suggest that structuring an interaction increases the proportion of argumentative discussion, whereas unstructured...
متن کاملCollaborative Learning Through Chat Discussions and Argument Diagrams in Secondary School
This study clarifies whether secondary school students develop their argumentation skills through reading and collaboration. The students first constructed an individual argument diagram on genetically modified organisms, read three articles, and improved their diagrams. Next, they engaged in a chat debate, reflected on their debate by constructing a collaborative argument diagram on it, and fi...
متن کاملPerspective-taking in Structured and Unstructured Online Discussions
This study analyzes the extent to which students using web-based discussion boards show an increase in perspective-taking in structured and unstructured discussions. Messages from fifty-six students enrolled in one of two courses were content analyzed using Jarvela and Hakkinen’s (2003) expansion of Selman’s (1980) perspective-taking coding scheme. There was a significant difference in the leve...
متن کاملMining Chat Discussions
INTRODUCTION According to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995), the majority of the organizational knowledge comes from interactions between people. People tend to reuse solutions from other persons in order to gain productivity. When people communicate to exchange information or acquire knowledge, the process is named Collaboration. Collaboration is one of the most important tasks for innovation and com...
متن کاملMiddle school science students’ dialogic argumentation
Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning are used to analyze students’ small group discourse during the evaluation of a science investigation project. Seventeen triads of middle school students participated in a structured 45-60 minute long interview. The broad set argumentation schemes employed by students, such as argument from sign and argument from consequences, suggests that the aut...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Educational Computing Research
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0735-6331,1541-4140
DOI: 10.2190/ec.47.2.d